Join Us to Defend Free Speech Rights on the National Mall

Join Us to Defend Free Speech Rights on the National Mall

Take action today

Picture Washington DC without mass demonstrations, without people coming together to redress grievances; a Washington DC that is radically different from the vibrant heart of political dissent that has been its historical role. That is the vision that the Bush Administration intends to implement unless we act now to stop them. 

We are launching a nationwide mobilization of public opinion to defend free speech rights in Washington, D.C. Unless we take action, the Bush Administration will, as one of its final acts, leave office having dramatically altered access of the people to public lands that have been the site of the most significant mass assembly protests in U.S. history.

There has already been an amazing response to the public appeal issued by the Partnership for Civil Justice calling on people to take action to defend free speech rights on the National Mall. More than 10,000 people have sent letters to the National Park Service in the last two weeks opposing the Bush Administration's efforts to restrict or ban protests on the Mall.

Join in demanding a moratorium on any plans to restrict access to the mall. There can be no designated protest zone or protest pit. We are demanding that there be an immediate halt to the proceedings to allow greater input from the American public.

We are writing to you today to urge you to become a member of this campaign. 

Here is how you can help as a member of the campaign

  • Circulate and get signers for the Statement in Defense of Free Speech Rights on the National Mall that is being signed by organizations across the United States who have used the National Mall in the exercise of free speech and also by prominent individuals in support of our First Amendment rights to freedom of assembly. Below is an initial list. There will be thousands more signers in the next few days. You can be part of this movement. 

Initial signers of the statement include:
Howard Zinn, professor, author of People's History of the United States
Ramsey Clark, former US Attorney General
Cindy Sheehan
Dennis Banks, Co-Founder, American Indian Movement
Malik Rahim, Co-Founder, Common Ground Collective, New Orleans
John Passacantando, Executive Director, Greenpeace USA
Mahdi Bray, Exec. Director, Muslim American Society, Freedom Foundation
Kathy Kelly, co-coordinator, Voices for Creative Nonviolence
Elias Rashmawi, National Coordinator, National Council of Arab Americans
Heidi Boghosian, Exec. Director of National Lawyers Guild
Jim Lafferty, Exec. Director of the National Lawyers Guild, Los Angeles
Tina Richards, CEO, Grassroots America
Brian Becker, National Coordinator, ANSWER Coalition
Michael Berg, father of Nicholas Berg, killed in Iraq
Dr. Harriet Adams, Esq.
Elliot Adams, President, Veterans for Peace
Jennifer Harbury, Human Rights Attorney
Ron Kovic, Vietnam Veteran, author, Born on the Fourth of July
Juan Jose Gutierrez, Latino Movement USA
Blase and Theresa Bonpane, Office of the Americas
Fernando Suarez Del Solar, Guerrero Azteca, father of Jesus Del Solar, soldier killed in Iraq
Chuck Kaufman, Alliance for Global Justice
Frank Dorrel, Publisher, Addicted to War
William Blum, Author
Sue Udry, Director, Defending Dissent Foundation
Annalisa Enrile, Mariposa Alliance
Ed Asner, Actor

  • Right now, you can write to the National Park Service to demand no new restrictions on the right of the people to assemble. We have set up an easy-to-use mechanism that will allow your message to be sent directly to the NPS and the Secretary of the Interior.

  • Send this email to everyone in your email address book and encourage them to join this effort. Please tell your friends, family and community, peace, and civil rights groups that you are a part of about this important fight for free speech -- forward this page.

  • Please Help with a Donation. This challenge, which ranges from the streets to the courtrooms, requires significant funds, and we simply cannot do it without your help. We will be placing newspaper ads, organizing rallies, letter writing and petition campaigns and more. Please click this link to make your donation right now

Today we are filing a Freedom of Information Act request with the U.S. National Park Service (NPS) to obtain the disclosure of organizations that have used the National Mall in the past five years for First Amendment events. When the NPS held its public hearing on this matter on January 12 we confronted them with the fact that they had done no legitimate outreach to notify the thousands of organizations who have used the Mall in recent years for free speech events about the proposed changes, even though they possess those records. Their attempt to exclude the people from this process could not be more clear.

Please read the important Washington Post article, "The Battle to Remold the Mall," below -- and take action today!


Mara Verheyden-Hilliard and Carl Messineo
co-founders, Partnership for Civil Justice 


Washington Post: The Battle To Remold the Mall
Sunday, January 20, 2008
By: Michael E. Ruane

Preservation Proposals Spark Debate Over Protest Rights

The National Park Service envisions a prime venue for demonstrations: a broad space at the foot of the Capitol with restrooms, seating, a paved surface, even a stand for the media.

Attorneys for activist groups fear a designated, government-approved "pit," limiting freedom of speech and movement in a hallowed place of protest.

The proposal to turn Union Square, the site of the Capitol reflecting pool and the Grant Memorial, into an "urban civic square" is one of many ideas the Park Service is mulling over as it plans the future of the Mall.

But that and other suggested changes have sparked harsh debate between government officials seeking to preserve one of the country's most heavily used national parks and activists concerned about limits on free speech and civil rights.

The faceoff prompted tense exchanges at a public meeting this month and demands for the Park Service to halt its planning and seek broader public input.

"This is a sugar-coating effort to conceal the real plan, which is to reorganize the Mall from its traditional venue as the heart and soul of this country's free-speech protest movement," said Brian Becker, national coordinator of the antiwar ANSWER coalition.

Susan Spain, project executive for the National Mall Plan, countered: "We are not seeking to restrict First Amendment demonstrations whatsoever."

The Park Service requires permits for most demonstrations and has "reasonable time, place and manner restrictions" for them, she said. What is proposed is only a better place to protest, with more facilities, she said.

But lawyer Mara Verheyden-Hilliard of the Partnership for Civil Justice, which advocates for protest groups, noted that the Capitol might not always be the protesters' target.

Demonstrators "also want to be able to protest as far back [on the Mall] as they need and as wide as they need," she said. "They have the right to . . . not be shunted off to a protest pit."

None of the proposals for the Mall's future, laid out in three mix-and-match alternatives, has been adopted. The Park Service says that they are only suggestions and that it is seeking public comment.

Last week, it extended the mail and online comment period through Feb. 15.

Information is available at

The proposals, which Spain said were developed from prior public input, are part of the Park Service's attempt to better manage the Mall, which has an estimated 25 million visitors a year and in many areas is worn from age and use.

The Park Service issues 3,000 permits a year for events on the Mall. About half are for "First Amendment" demonstrations. Most of those involving politics draw a few hundred people or fewer, officials said, with perhaps a dozen or so attracting more than 5,000.

The National Mall & Memorial Parks -- the official name -- extends from the Capitol to the Lincoln Memorial and is home to the Washington Monument, the Jefferson Memorial and the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. It also includes the Tidal Basin, the National World War II Memorial and the Korean War Veterans Memorial.

It has extensive maintenance problems. Many grassy areas are worn down to the bare dirt. Parts of the wall and walkway around the Tidal Basin have sunk so far that they are submerged at high tide. And the outdoor Sylvan Theater, which sits next to the Washington Monument and traces its history to 1917, looks shabby and dilapidated.

Indeed, one of the proposals is to move the Sylvan Theater, whose 1970s structure stands about 10 feet from the Washington Monument's new security perimeter. A new location was not identified.

Another idea calls for filling in the north bay of the Tidal Basin and removing the Kutz Bridge, which carries eastbound Independence Avenue traffic over the basin.

The Kutz Bridge entered Washington lore in 1974 when a girlfriend of U.S. Rep. Wilbur D. Mills jumped from it into the water during a police stop. A stripper known professionally as "Fanne Foxe," she was rescued unharmed, although Mills's reputation was tarnished.

The Park Service says that the north bay has been the site of fish kills and that the narrow sidewalks along the bridge are crowded and dangerous during peak tourist season.

Other proposals call for paving the Mall's gravel walkways and building a playground near its carousel.

Union Square, between Maryland and Pennsylvania avenues and Third and First streets NW, has been a controversial place for demonstrations. Prior to President Bush's 2006 State of the Union address, protesters had to go to federal court to gain access to the site, which police had said was inside a security perimeter.

Much of the roughly 18-acre square is occupied by the large reflecting pool, which is favored by photographers but filled with dirty water and populated by seagulls. The pool was installed in the late 1960s during the creation of the Interstate 395 tunnel beneath the Capitol and has little historic value, experts say.

Some of the ideas call for removing the pool and paving the square, equipping it as a place to host protests and performances. The Park Service estimates that it could hold more than 50,000 people.

During a Jan. 12 public meeting in the Old Post Office Pavilion, Spain said large demonstrations would not be restricted from spreading across the Mall. Park Service spokesman Bill Line said later that the vast majority of demonstrations would fit tidily in Union Square.

The idea is "how do we better accommodate things, and how do we design for them" Spain said, "and also have this place look the way the American public would like the welcoming space in our nation to look." She said the chief sentiment among 5,000 prior public comments was that the Mall does not look as good as it should. So another proposal suggests "mandatory rest periods between events" to "protect natural resources and views."

But Verheyden-Hilliard argued that the Park Service was unfairly linking appearance and protest.

"They're suggesting that robust political speech and use of [the Mall] . . . for political protest is somehow incongruous or in conflict with the location itself," she said.

"Grass grows back. Free speech doesn't."

Take Action

Sign the Statement in Defense of Free Speech Rights on the National Mall
Click this link to send your message to the National Park Service
Forward this page by clicking this link
Please click this link to make a donation right now