On the morning of September 27, 2002, the D.C. Police Department working with the U.S. Park Police encircled Pershing Park, refused to allow anyone to leave and then arrested and hog-tied peaceful demonstrators, tourists, passers-by, and legal observers. Many were bound wrist to ankle on a police gym floor for upwards of 24 hours.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia certified this lawsuit as a class action with respect to the Pershing Park arrests, with attorneys at the Partnership for Civil Justice as class counsel.
After more than seven years of intense litigation, the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund announced that it had reached a proposed settlement with the District of Columbia. The settlement will provide up to $18,000 in compensation for each person arrested in Pershing Park, plus will impose new policies and practices on the MPD and its attorneys. Those who were arrested will have their records expunged and their arrests declared null and void.
Click here for the Memorandum in Support of the Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval. Click here for the Court's Order granting Preliminary Approval.
The Pershing Park case received national and international focus after it was revealed by the PCJF that the MPD and its attorneys had engaged in widespread destruction and withholding of evidence. PCJF attorneys uncovered and exposed that the Command Center Running Resume, a comprehensive computer database repository of police activity and decisions on the day of the arrest, had been destroyed. PCJF attorneys, conducting a painstaking and detailed review of audio recordings also discovered that the system tapes of the days' dispatch and police radio communications appeared to have been edited. The District of Columbia was forced to concede that "some, if not all" of the scores of hours of radio recordings were missing data.
The Barham settlement exceeds $8.25 million. It comes on the heels of the announced $13.7 million settlement of the mass arrest class action claims in the case of Becker v. District of Columbia, which arose out of an April 15, 2000 mass arrest using the same unlawful police tactics. The PCJF is class counsel in the Becker case also.
The equitable relief provisions in these two class settlements imposes many new requirements on police and attorney practices in demonstration cases, including: That the MPD and the D.C. Office of the Attorney General is required to centrally index and log all materials collected and reviewed in demonstration cases, a measure calculated to create an audit trail that will prevent future acts of evidence destruction; funding is established for document management software to be used to log and index evidence; new mandatory requirements are imposed for the preservation and indexing of, and maintenance of the integrity of, the command center running resume, recorded police communications and video recorded evidence; and ongoing obligations for the Office of the Attorney General to report to PCJF attorneys every six months for the next 3 years on the implementation of these measures. There are additional training and accountability requirements for police personnel including requirements for training on lawful standard operating procedures in the context of First Amendment protected assemblies and mass demonstrations; and additional obligations when the MPD obtains the assistance of outside law enforcement agencies for demonstration related duties.
The arrests of the over 1,000 persons falsely arrested in these two mass arrests will be declared to be "null and void" by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and all arrest records will be expunged.
The Becker and Barham class action settlements constitute the largest protest-related settlements in U.S. history. |
|
|
September 2002 Mass Arrest Claims Deadline Nears
Monday, June 14, 2010
(to general list)
|
|
Wash Post: D.C. to pay $8.25 million to settle suit over '02 mass arrests
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Reprint
|
|
Washington City Paper: Pershing Park Plaintiffs Speak Out On Settlement
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Reprint
|
|
Legal Times: D.C. Agrees to Pershing Park Settlement of $8.25 Million
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Reprint
|
|
Pershing Park Settlement Announced
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Press Release
|
|
Washington City Paper: District Settles Pershing Park Case
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Reprint
|
|
PCJF First Amendment Cases Spark Investigation
Thursday, December 10, 2009
NY Times: "Inquiry Raises More Questions in Case of Arrests After '02 Protest in Capital"
|
|
New York Times: Inquiry Raises More Questions in Case of Arrests After '02 Protest in Capital
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Reprint
|
|
Washington Post: Ex-D.C. chief's statement on mass arrest disputed
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Detective's affidavit says he heard Ramsey give the order in 2002
|
|
Wash Post: Pershing Park Runaround
Thursday, August 6, 2009
District owes answers about city lawyers' alleged misconduct
|
|
Legal Times: Federal Judge to D.C.: 'There will be significant prices to pay'
Friday, July 31, 2009
Reprint from the Blog of the Legal Times
|
|
Federal judge blasts D.C. Attorney General's Office for concealment of evidence
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Judge: 'Case appears to be civil counterpart of Ted Stevens case'
|
|
Wash Post: U.S. Judge Blasts D.C.'s Handling of Protest Cases
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Reprint
|
|
Washington Examiner: Federal judge wants probe of missing police records
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Reprint
|
|
Barham Class Successful in Lifting Stay of Discovery
Wednesday, June 27, 2007
Discovery, which has been stayed (prohibited) for over a year, is now authorized. Depositions of former Police Chief Charles H. Ramsey and Assistant Police Chief Peter J. Newsham may now proceed.
|
|
Top Park Police Official May be Sued Personally for Sept 27, 2002 Mass False Arrest
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
In a critical ruling and great victory for the class plaintiffs, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an opinion - - agreeing with the arguments submitted by the Partnership for Civil Justice as class counsel - - holding that the senior U.S. Park Police official, Richard Murphy, may be held personally and financially liable for his command of federal agents during the September 27, 2002 Pershing Park mass false arrest.
|
|
Court Rejects FBI's Bid to be Dismissed from September 27, 2002 Class Action
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Judge Emmet G. Sullivan today denied the FBI's motion to be dismissed from the Barham class action lawsuit. Plaintiffs have charged the FBI with engaging in a mass intelligence operation that relied on mass false arrests to unconstitutionally collect data on activists.
|
|
Washington Post: DC Settles Suit Over Vt & K Protest Arrests
Thursday, March 1, 2007
$50,000 Payment to Each of Four Vt & K Arrestees Plus Attorneys Fees and Costs and Police Training and Notice of First Amendment Rights Required
|
|
Settlement Reached for Sept. 27 2002, Vt & K Arrests
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
The Partnership for Civil Justice has reached a settlement with the District of Columbia over the false arrests and abusive detention of four people who were swept up by the police in a political round-up on September 27, 2002 at Vermont and K Streets N.W. during a protest against the IMF/World Bank and the then-threatened war in Iraq. The police sprung pop-up police lines, trapped, surrounded and detained dozens of protestors, legal observers and passersby. Those arrested were held overnight, tied wrist to ankle in stress and duress positions. Each plaintiff will receive $50,000 (plus attorneys fees and costs), and the DC MPD will have to train officers in free speech protections. The Pershing Park class action in which PCJ is counsel is still being litigated.
|
|